There are several steps involved in the completion of a Rapid Review. The following guide to the Rapid Review process provides a summary of the key steps that are involved.
Here are a list of useful guides, articles and other sources that were consulted during the course of the compilation of this guide. Please view these and other sources to gain a more detailed insight into the Rapid Review process.
Ahern, S., Marshall, S., Wallbank, G., Jawad, D., Taki, S., Baur, L. and Ming Wen, L., n.d. Communication strategies and effectiveness of early childhood obesity related prevention programs for linguistically diverse communities – A Rapid Review. Open Science Framework. [online] Available at: <https://osf.io/uekw6>.
Anon. 2014. Campbell Collaboration Systematic Reviews: Policies and Guidelines. [online] The Campbell Collaboration. https://doi.org/10.4073/cpg.2016.1.
Booth, A. and Carroll, C., 2015. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable? Health Information & Libraries Journal, 32(3), pp.220–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12108.
Devane, D., Hamel, C., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Griebler, U., Affengruber, L., Saif-Ur-Rahman, K. and Garritty, C., 2024. Key concepts in rapid reviews: an overview. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 175, p.111518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111518.
Dobbins, M., 2017. Steps for conducting a rapid review. McMaster University: National Colloborating Centre for Methods and Tools.
Garritty, C., Hamel, C., Trivella, M., Gartlehner, G., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Devane, D., Kamel, C., Griebler, U. and King, V.J., 2024a. Updated recommendations for the Cochrane rapid review methods guidance for rapid reviews of effectiveness. BMJ : British Medical Journal (Online), 384, p.e076335. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-076335.
Garritty, C., Tricco, A.C., Smith, M., Pollock, D., Kamel, C. and King, V.J., 2024b. Rapid Reviews Methods Series: Involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 29(1), pp.55–61. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070.
Haby, M.M., Barreto, J.O.M., Kim, J.Y.H., Peiris, S., Mansilla, C., Torres, M., Guerrero-Magaña, D.E. and Reveiz, L., 2024. What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies. Research Synthesis Methods, 15(1), pp.2–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1664.
Iverson, T., Abbasi, E., Esfandiari, E. and Ashe, M., n.d. A Rapid Review of the Effect of Volunteers for Diabetes Self-Management. PROSPERO. [online] Available at: <https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023453506> [Accessed 30 April 2025].
Khangura, S., Konnyu, K., Cushman, R., Grimshaw, J. and Moher, D., 2012. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic Reviews, 1(1), p.10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-1-10.
King, V.J., Stevens, A., Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Kamel, C. and Garritty, C., 2022. Paper 2: Performing rapid reviews. Systematic Reviews, 11(1), p.151. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02011-5.
Lerner, A.H., Klein, E.J., Hardesty, A., Panagiotou, O.A., Misquith, C. and Farmakiotis, D., 2021. Comparison of COVID-19 outcomes in organ transplant recipients (OTr) and non-transplant patients: a study protocol for rapid review. Systematic Reviews, [online] 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01854-8.
Martinez, S. and Palacios, C., n.d. A rapid review of additional support provided to primary caregivers to improve infant feeding. PROSPERO. [online] Available at: <https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42020151827>.
Nussbaumer-Streit, B., Sommer, I., Hamel, C., Devane, D., Noel-Storr, A., Puljak, L., Trivella, M. and Gartlehner, G., 2023. Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 28(6), pp.418–423. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185.
Pandor, A., Kaltenthaler, E., James, M.M.-S., Wong, R., Cooper, K., Dimairo, M., O’Cathain, A., Campbell, F. and Booth, A., 2019. Delphi consensus reached to produce a decision tool for SelecTing Approaches for Rapid Reviews (STARR). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 114, pp.22–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.06.005.
Tricco, A.C., Khalil, H., Holly, C., Feyissa, G., Godfrey, C., Evans, C., Sawchuck, D., Sudhakar, M., Asahngwa, C., Stannard, D., Abdulahi, M., Bonnano, L., Aromataris, E., McInerney, P., Wilson, R., Pang, D., Wang, Z., Cardoso, A.F., Peters, M.D.J., Marnie, C., Barker, T., Pollock, D., McArthur, A. and Munn, Z., 2022. Rapid reviews and the methodological rigor of evidence synthesis: a JBI position statement. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 20(4), p.944. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-00371.