MTU library staff provide introductory systematic review training and support for staff and research students.
If you require systematic review support, library staff offer ‘one to one’ training or a group session which highlights key aspects of the review process. (This session normally takes between 60 – 90 minutes).
During this session, you will receive guidance on the following:
The differences between a Systematic Literature Review and a Systematic Review are as follows:
Systematic Literature Review | Systematic Review |
Provides a subjective summary of the literature on a topic | Brings together the results of studies to answer a specific question |
Thorough search of published literature | Extensive search covering published literature. More detailed systematic reviews will also include grey literature. |
Includes a detailed search strategy | Involves a detailed protocol often developed using the PICO framework |
Can be produced by a single person, so open to bias | Usually involves three or more people to eliminate bias (*A more limited version can be done by a single student for their dissertation) |
Can take weeks or months to complete. | Large, professional systematic reviews can take months or years to produce |
Includes...
|
Includes...
Detailed appendices showing search strategies |
Summary adapted from: Kysh, L. (n.d.) What's in a name? The difference between a systematic review and a literature review and why it matters. URL: https://figshare.com/articles/Difference_between_a_systematic_review_and_a_literature_review/76636 4 [30 Jan.2025] |
Due to the in-depth and time-intensive nature of the systematic review process and other work commitments, library staff will not be able to undertake a review on behalf of an individual or research group or work alongside them during the review process.
Library staff will offer advice on the development of a search strategy during the initial consultation; however, we will not be able to contribute to the development of this search strategy over the course of the entire review process.
Library staff will not be able to execute searches, de-duplicate lists of results or create a reference management database on behalf of the individual / research group. The individual or group involved in the review process will however receive initial guidance on the skills required to carry out these tasks.
Your research supervisor will be able to provide additional guidance on such matters as developing your study methodology (research protocol), evaluating findings, and writing the systematic review.